The Street Blogger

Joe Biden calls to ban AI voice impersonation

Joe Biden calls to ban AI voice impersonation

Joe Biden, during his State of the Union address, addressed several technological issues, including voice cloning by artificial intelligence (AI). The president has expressed his desire to ban AI voice impersonation, a move that appears to be a direct response to a recent attempt to influence an election using his own voice.

Details of Biden’s proposal

In his speech, Biden said: “Strengthen sanctions against fentanyl trafficking, pass bipartisan privacy legislation to protect our children online, harness the promise of AI to protect us from peril, prohibit spoofing voice identity through AI, and more.” This statement highlights the importance the president places on this issue.

Background to the controversial robocall

In January, a robocall in New Hampshire sowed confusion among Democratic voters by urging them not to participate in the primary election. The call, almost identical to Joe Biden’s voice, was created using a text-to-speech engine, sparking concerns about potential election manipulation.

FCC Response and Legislative Action

Following this incident, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) responded by banning the use of AI-generated voices in robocalls. The move is part of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, which aims to prevent fraud and misinformation.

The challenges of the proposed ban

Reach and Impact

Biden’s proposed ban raises important questions about the scope and impact of such a measure. If it’s limited to impersonating political figures, it might not have as much of an effect on other areas where AI voice impersonation is also a concern. However, if extended to all forms of voice spoofing, it could have far-reaching consequences for the development and use of text-to-speech technology.

Technological Limitations

A widespread ban could also hinder research and development of legitimate technologies that use text-to-speech for beneficial applications, such as voice assistance systems for people with disabilities or advanced user interfaces for electronic devices. Striking a balance between protecting against abuse and promoting technological innovation is crucial.

Legal and Ethical Challenges

Legally, such a ban would raise complex questions regarding the rights of software users and developers, as well as liability for misuse of the technology. Additionally, ethical considerations must be taken into account, particularly regarding freedom of expression and the implications for individual privacy.

Need for additional measures

Finally, a ban alone cannot solve all the problems associated with AI voice spoofing. It is necessary to put in place complementary measures, such as public awareness and education efforts on the risks associated with this technology, as well as mechanisms to detect and prevent its misuse.

Ethical and legal considerations

Beyond politics, the use of AI to reproduce actors’ voices and appearances has raised ethical and legal questions. The SAG-AFTRA actors’ strike has highlighted the need for fair consent and compensation for the use of AI replicas, even if not all actors are happy with the deal reached.

Overall, Biden’s proposal highlights the challenges and dilemmas associated with the growing use of AI in various areas of society, particularly with regard to identity protection and privacy preservation. integrity of democratic processes.

Exit mobile version